ForumsQuestionsAutomatic Sequence Enforcement

Automatic Sequence Enforcement

Author	Message
Frisco Websites	Posted: Oct 02, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Frisco Websites Posted: Oct 02, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Another vote -
Alan	Posted: Oct 02, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Alan Posted: Oct 02, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Posted by Toodledo: This is what we are calling "Task Dependency" and it is on our to-do list. Oooooo. I quiver in anticipation.
Craig.RT	Posted: Oct 20, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Craig.RT Posted: Oct 20, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Posted by aggiejason: I know that it is not policy to share roadmaps/futures, but I also know that I've seen posts from as long as 2 years ago that mention that task dependency is on your to-do list. Could you at least maybe share if it's on your current @work context or if it's just one of those "someday/maybe" kind of things? :) I would also like to know this. It seems to have been on your list for a while now.
Martin M	Posted: Oct 22, 2010 Score: 0 Reference Martin M Posted: Oct 22, 2010 Score: 0 Reference +1 from me!
Fred_1341415216	Posted: Jan 26, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Fred_1341415216 Posted: Jan 26, 2011 Score: 0 Reference +1
arthurwallace007	Posted: Jan 30, 2011 Score: 0 Reference arthurwallace007 Posted: Jan 30, 2011 Score: 0 Reference +1 thanks!
Mick	Posted: May 23, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Mick Posted: May 23, 2011 Score: 0 Reference +1 Can you give us an idea how this feature request is prioritized?
Jake Toodledo Founder	Posted: May 24, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Jake (Founder) Posted: May 24, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Sorry, we dont comment on roadmaps or prioritization because it changes often.
DSM_2	Posted: May 24, 2011 Score: 0 Reference DSM_2 Posted: May 24, 2011 Score: 0 Reference So what's the status of "task dependency"?
Saurnil	Posted: May 26, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Saurnil Posted: May 26, 2011 Score: 0 Reference +1
jonathan.creech	Posted: Sep 12, 2011 Score: 0 Reference jonathan.creech Posted: Sep 12, 2011 Score: 0 Reference +1
Folke X	Posted: Sep 12, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Folke X Posted: Sep 12, 2011 Score: 0 Reference Not that I want to argue with you all - I'd rather not, and if this is what you would like to have, then that is perfectly fine with me. But just in case you haven't thought about it, you can think of task dependencies as stages of progression rather than as strict dependencies. For example, you could use the Status field for this, which is what I do: The things you need to do now are "Next Actions". The ones that are doable and will follow are "Active", and so on. This manual promotion has some advantages having to do with the fact that it is often possible, from the individual project's point of view, to do several things in parallel, but you may not have the time, from an overall point of view, to put more than a certain amount of time into each project. By manually reviewing and promoting taks, and occasionally demoting some, you can balance your efforts between your different projects depending on your overall workload. This message was edited Sep 12, 2011.
stephen_1313405367	Posted: Oct 28, 2011 Score: 0 Reference stephen_1313405367 Posted: Oct 28, 2011 Score: 0 Reference +1 for me to. I am trying to advise our organisation (35 staff) and our or will pay for each staff member but this is the deal breaker for us. Some kind of idea would be helpful cause the Mac fanboys in the organisation are pushing for Omnifocus... Ballpark ETA?