ForumsQuestionsIncrease priority's granularity please. Med Low High don't scale
Increase priority's granularity please. Med Low High don't scale
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Captain_Obvious |
Rather than allowing the manual ordering, Why not simply add more level of Priority,
There is currently only 4 level of priority, (negative ?) (Poor) By the very definition of the word there can only be one TOP priority. (Wrong) How are we supposed to order say +20 tasks by priority if they overlaps. I suggest going from -1 to 10 and have a Up/Down arrow. While on the subject, It also make more sense that when I press the UP arrow the priority goes UP, It is now the opposite. (Wrong) Also Some peoples pointed out here http://www.toodledo.com/forums/2/6633/-34829/change-priority-so-1-highest.html Priority 1 should be the highest. This is also the opposite. (Wrong) This message was edited Sep 04, 2010. |
|
Salgud |
Approach to posting. (Wrong)
|
|
Captain_Obvious |
Attempt at making succinct and relevant comments. Fail.
|
|
SRhyse |
In lieu of more levels of priority, you could try alpha numeric tags, folders, contexts, what have you. 01, 02, on through 99, or 001, 002, on through 999 if you wanted to break the bank with it. Or 1, 2, 2.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, etc.
You can do it with naming as well if you used the method described here- https://www.toodledo.com/forums/3/5357/-28563/mindmapping-projects-to-tasks.html Or have all, as in every single one, of your tasks as subtasks of one parent task, and order everything as you'd like. |
|
Captain_Obvious |
good idead but It could mess my current tag usage, and hotlist would be near useless.
Thank you, for taking the time. |
|
JMGPublic |
I also vote for more granularity in Priority. I would prefer 1-10. If you don't need them you would have to use them, but I need to be able to more finely tune the sort order.
And a quick thanks - I love toodledo and preach it to all my friends and colleauges (both of them, lol) |
|
Jake Toodledo Founder |
Thanks for the suggestion. We can't comment on a timeframe for implementation, but this is on our to-do list.
|
You cannot reply yet
U Back to topic home
R Post a reply
To participate in these forums, you must be signed in.